Challenge B: If we can solve Challenge A, how can we concurrently solidly ensure legitimate lawful access to prevent grave crimes and enable its sustainable adoption?
No ratings
Presented at FSC6thEdition 2019 by
Can providers of ultra-high assurance* IT reliably offer compliance mechanisms to legitimate lawful access requests – voluntarily (i.e. in addition to what’s required by selected jurisdictions) – while overall reducing both resulting risks for the privacy of users and for public safety? If so, how?What are the core paradigms of such certification processes?Can the same extreme technical and human safeguards that are needed to deliver ultra-high assurance also enable voluntary compliance to lawful access request – at least in some EU states – that overall reduce the risk of privacy rights abuse of end-users by anyone to levels that are radically or substantially lower than any of the other alternative secure IT systems which do not offer such voluntary processing? Could or should such processes rely on a provider-managed voluntary data and/or key recovery scheme that is certified and overseen by primarily-non-governmental radically citizen-accountable, independent and competent international body? Could the inevitable added risk be essentially shifted from technical systems to resilient in-person organizational processes?